In brief for week ending 5 February 2014

Make sure that you have not missed a key development in your area of the law by reading our In brief review of the latest Practical Law Public Sector e-mail.

Civil litigation:

  • The High Court has:
  • New practice directions for parties concerning cases brought before the ECJ have been published in the Official Journal.
  • The government has announced plans to raise the financial limit below which equity claims can be commenced in the county court to £350,000.

Commercial:

  • The Consumer Rights Bill 2014 has been formally introduced into the House of Commons and has completed its first and second readings.

Education and social services:

  • The Court of Appeal has given guidance that split hearings (where facts are considered separately from their welfare context) should only be used where a “stark and discrete” issue is to be determined (Re S (A Child)).
  • The High Court has stated that in care proceedings, the court will not delay requiring a party to provide a comprehensive response to a threshold document, even if that party is a defendant in linked criminal proceedings and has not yet filed a criminal defence statement (A Local Authority v DG and others).
  • The DfE has published updated advice and guidance on school behaviour.
  • The DfE has published a consultation on supporting pupils with medical conditions.

Employment and pensions:

  • The Welfare Benefits Up-rating Order 2014 has been made, which provides for the up-rating of certain social security benefits and payments which are to be increased by 1% from 6 April 2014.
  • An employment tribunal has ruled that the definition of race in the Equality Act 2010 (which includes “ethnic origin”) is wide enough to encompass caste (Tirkey v Chandok and another).

Environment:

FOI and data protection:

  • The Secretary of State has vetoed the disclosure of project assessment information about the HS2 rail link.
  • The First-tier Tribunal (Information Rights) has held that the Home Office did not have to disclose details of two of its immigration decisions following an information request from a business school (Goldsmith International Business School v Information Commissioner).
  • The ICO has published its response to the government’s consultation on local authority parking.

Health:

  • Monitor has decided to close its investigation into the commissioning of specialist cancer surgery services in Greater Manchester and Cheshire.

Housing:

  • The Court of Appeal has held that it had no jurisdiction to hear an application for interim relief requiring a local authority to continue to house a homeless man pending the outcome of a substantive appeal to the Court of Appeal (Johnson v Lord Mayor and Citizens of Westminster).

Local government:

Property and planning:

Public procurement:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *